State Welfarism and Social Welfare in Asia

Authors

  • Dr Indra P TIWARI Graduate School of Social and Environmental Development National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, THAILAND

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v2i2.70

Keywords:

Welfarism, Social welfare policy, State, Government, Asia

Abstract

This paper has analyzed and discussed the social welfare policies of the Asian countries—the responsibilities of international activist institutions and the State towards individuals in terms of state welfarism and social and economic protection, and the conventional family system, which was and still is the core responsible institution for the well-being of its members. The paper has presented economic and poverty indicators (19), demographic, social and economic indicators associated social welfarism (16), satisfaction related indicators (7), and funding related indicators that have association with social welfarism (9). This has also analyzed and discussed the gap between the international propaganda on social welfare, social policies of the Government and its actual delivery and the situation of vacuum being created due to the moribund family system of slothful state welfarism, in the new living context created by the notion of right-prone individualism. The study has identified along with their history of starting social security provisions the present state major workfare and welfare and welfare protection in the Asian countries, thereby explored countries falling into five levels of social welfare system by taking a combined state of poverty, vulnerable employment, and government expenditure on education, health and social protection, namely (i) early stage of welfare system; (ii) transition to take-off stage of welfare system; (iii) take-off stage of welfare system; (iv) transition to drive to maturity stage of welfare system; and (v) the drive to maturity stage of welfare system. Finally, the paper has presented the critical areas for dialogue where the synergy of the propagandist international activism, state slothfulness, moribund family dynamics, and right-prone individualism interface for a reliable and sustainable social welfare with affection, protection, nurturance, and protection thereby live in peace and harmony with dignity.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

11-20 of 421

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.