Reorganization of Practicum in Initial Teacher Education: A Search for Challenges in Implementation by Ex-Ante Evaluation

Laila Niklasson

Abstract


The background of the study is a perceived need of increasing quality in practice during Initial Teacher Education (ITE) in Sweden. In order to achieve higher quality, the government encourages reorganization towards a limited number of practice schools, competence development for supervisors and research focusing on the selected practice schools.  The aim of this study is to present and critically discuss prerequisites for implementation of the reform. The paper focuses on how a preliminary logic model and a SWOT analysis can show challenges encountered during the implementation of the reorganization. By using the logic model and the SWOT analysis an ex-ante evaluation was carried out in two steps. The results disclosed that the motivation behind reorganization, improving the quality of practicum, might meet some challenges. Indicators of higher quality being attained are not provided; the local organization is expected to construct such indicators during the process. In contrast to the challenges the results showed that the implementation was supported by earlier good relations and a common idea of developing practicum in ITE. The implication for implementation is a need to have a dialogue about indicators for quality among different stakeholders in ITE. Without such a dialogue it can be disputed whether the change in practicum was successful.


Keywords


Implementation of change, Initial Teacher Education, logic model, practicum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burke, W. W. (2011). Organization change: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Cojocariu, V-M, Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & lazar, G. (2014). SWOT-analysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries.

Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 116, 1999-2003.

Darling-Hammond, L., Bullmaster, L. M., & Cobb, L. V. (1995). Rethinking teacher leadership through professional development schools. The elementary school Journal, 96(1), 87-106.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). The case for university-based teacher education. In R. Roth (Ed.) The role of the university in the preparation of teachers, 8-24. London: Falmer Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gaffey, V. (2013). A fresh look at the intervention logic of Structural Funds. Evaluation, 19(2), 195-2013.

Fielden, K. S., Rusch, L. M., Masinda, T. M., Sands, J., Frankish, J., & Evoy, B. (2007). Key considerations for logic model development in research partnerships: A Canadian case study. Evaluation and program planning, 30, 115-124.

Fitzpatrick, T. (2012). Evaluating legislation: An alternative approach for evaluating EU Internal market and services law. Evaluation, 18(4), 477-499.

Fitzpatrick, L. J., Sanders, R. J., & Worthen, R. B. (2004). Program evaluation. Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Boston: Pearson education, Inc.

Forss, K. & Rebien, C. (2014). Is there a Nordic/Scandinavian evaluation tradition? Evaluation, 20(4), 467-470.

Furlong, J., Campbell, A., Howson, J., Lewis, S., & McNamara, O. (2006). Partnership in English initial teacher education: changing times, changing definitions – Evidence from the Teacher training agency national partnership project. Scottish educational review, 37, 32-45.

Helms, M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT-analysis – where are we now? Journal of strategy and management, 3(3), 215-251.

Holliday, R. L. (2014). Using logic model mapping to evaluate program fidelity. Studies in educational evaluation, 42, 109-117.

Iucu, R., & Platis, M. (2012). Management of the professional practical training – strengths and weaknesses. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 46, 4226-4229.

Lawson, T., Cakmak, M., Gündüz, M., & Busher, H. (2015). Research in teaching practicum – a systematic review. European journal of teacher education, 38(3), 392-407.

Lehtonen, M. (2014). Evaluating megaprojects: From the 'iron triangle' to network mapping. Evaluation, 20(3) 278–295.

Moran, A., Abbott, L., & Clarke, L. (2009). Re-conceptualizing partnerships across the teacher education continuum. Teaching and teacher education, 25, 951-958.

Mälardalens högskola (2014). Ansökan om deltagande i försöksverksamhet med övningsskolor och övningsförskolor [Application for participation in a trial with practice schools and practice preschools]. Västerås.

Niklasson, L. (2011). Teacher education in Sweden: The organization of today and some challenges for tomorrow. In Malena Zuljan Valencic, & Janez Vogrinc (Eds.) European dimensions of teacher education: Similarities and differences. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenien, pp. 97-114.

Niklasson, L. (2014). Funções e contextos da formação inicial de professores: o desenvolvimento do profissionalismo [Roles and settings in the Initial Teacher Education concerning the development of professionalism]. In Maria Assunção Flores (Ed.) Formação e Desenvolvimento Profissional de Professores: Contributos Internacioanis, pp. 81-104. Coimbra: Almedina Editora.

Poon, B., Leung Wing-sea, J., Louie, A., & Vergel de Dios, C. (2013). The key functions of collaborative logic modelling: insights from the British Columbia Early childhood dental programs. The Canadian journal of program evaluation, 27(2), 87-102.

Prop. 2009/10:89. Bäst i klassen – en ny lärarutbildning [Best in class – a new teacher education]. Stockholm.

Sanderson, J. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations. International journal of project management 30(4), 432–43.

Scribner-Bartholomew, S. & Haymore Sandholtz, J. (2009). Competing views of teaching in a school-university partnership. Teaching and teacher education, 25, 155-165.

SFS 2014:2. Förordning om försöksverksamhet med övningsskolor och övningsförskolor inom lärar- och förskollärarutbildningar [Ordinance about trial with practice schools and practice preschools within teacher and preschool teacher education]. Stockholm.

SFS 2010:800. Skollag [Education Act]. Stockholm.

SKOLSFS 1998:16/2011:69. Läroplan för förskolan [Curriculum for the preschool]. Stockholm.

SKOLSFS 2010:37. Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and after school centre]. Stockholm.

SKOLSFS 2011:144. Läroplan för gymnasieskolan [Curriculum for the upper secondary school]. Stockholm.

SOU 2008:109. En hållbar lärarutbildning. Betänkande från Utredningen om ny lärarutbildning. [A sustainable teacher education. Report from The Inquiry on a new teacher education program]. Stockholm.

Smith, K. (2010). Assessing the Practicum in teacher education – Do we want candidates and mentors to agree? Studies in educational evaluation, 36, 36-41.

Smith, I., Brisard, E., & Menter, I. (2006). Models of partnership developments in initial teacher education in the four components of the United Kingdom: recent trends and current changes. Journal of education for teaching, 32(2), 147-164.

Utbildningsdepartementet (2014). En försöksverksamhet med övningsskolor och övningsförskolor [A trial with practice schools and practice preschools]. Stockholm.

Van der Knaap, P. (2011). Sense and complexity: Initiatives in responsive performance audits. Evaluation, 17(4), 351-363.

Vetenskapsrådet (2011). Good research practice. Stockholm.

Volkov, B. B. (2011). Beyond being an evaluator: The multiplicity of roles of the internal evaluator. In B. B. Volkov & M. E. Baron (Eds.). Internal evaluation in the 21st century, New Directions for Evaluation, 132, 25-42.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/journal.v4i9.806

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.............................................................................................................................

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

.............................................................................................................................

If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to support@theartsjournal.org. Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add theartsjournal.org in your email safe list.

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Print) ISSN:2167-9045

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Online) ISSN: 2167-9053