Towards Solving the Synoptic Problem for African Biblical Exegesis
Keywords:The Gospels, Synoptic Gospels, Synoptic Problem, African Biblical Exegesis
AbstractDoing biblical exegesis, say in Africa, is not easy; selected text must be interpreted to carry the same meaning as the author meant, whiles making it relevant to the new environment the gospel finds itself. The situation becomes challenging when the selected text is part of the range of texts with Synoptic Problem. This problem has lingered on years in biblical studies. Propounded by J. J. Griesbach, the Synoptic Problem is a way of referring to questions and possible explanations about the seeming differences and peculiarities of the Synoptic Gospels—Matthew, Mark and Luke—due to their writing styles (word order, word used, and grammatical variations, or dissimilar tenacities) of telling the gospel story. After reviewing solutions propounded by scholars, it was realised that each had a shortfall, including B. H. Streeter’s Four-Source Theory. For while at one point each tries to address the problem, at the other end they seem to create another challenge; making it difficult for proper biblical exegesis. Improving on B. H. Streeter’s Four-Source Theory, it is proposed that the “Four-Source Theory with Lukan priority over Matthew” be accepted in solving the Synoptic Problem. This is to help African biblical exegetes to conduct exegesis on parallel passages that are different in settings, vocabulary, among others; thereby, enabling them to understand the text in their context as written by the original author.
Adamo, David T. “What is African Biblical Hermeneutics?” Black Theology, 13(1), (2015): 59-72.
Ali, Ben, Lecture Notes on New Testament Survey. Pentecost University, 2010.
Asamoah, Emmanuel Foster, “Role of Culture in Bible Interpretation: A Reference to Asante-Twi Reading Community” European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 5(5), (2020): 1-14.
Berchie, Daniel, Lecture Notes on New Testament Studies. Department of Education, Valley View University, 2015
Botello, Jennell, Composition date of the Synoptic Gospels. Florida International University, Unpublished Thesis, 2007.
Bratcher, Dennis, The Gospels and The Synoptic Problem: The Literary Relationship of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, (2018). Accessed online on February 10, 2022, from http://www.crivoice.org/synoptic.html.
Carlson, Stephen C. “The Synoptic Problem Home Page”, 2003. In Scott Fillmer, The Synoptic Problem: A brief overview into the Synoptic Problem. Unpublished, 2009.
Carson, D.A. & Moo, Douglas, An Introduction to the New Testament, Second edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2005.
Davis, J., K. Mengersen, S. Bennett, and L. Mazerolle. “Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses”, SpringerPlus, 3 (511), (2014): 1-9.
Enns, Paul, The Moody Handbook of Theology. Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2008.
Fee, Gordon D., New Testament Exegesis: A Handbook for Students and Pastor, Revised Edition. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1993.
Freed, Edwin D. The New Testament: A Critical Introduction. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing, 1991.
Goodacre, Mark, The Case Against Q: Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002.
Goodacre, Mark, The Synoptic Problem: A way through the maze. London: T & T Clark International, 2005.
Green, Joel B., Scot McKnight and I. Howard Marshall (eds), Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. Downers Grove: IVP, 1992.
Griesbach, J.J. Synopsis Evangeliorum Matlhaei, Marci et Lucae. Halle, 1776.
Hiebert, D. Edmond, An Introduction to the New Testament: The Gospels and Acts. Chicago: Moody, 1975.
J., Felix Just S., The Synoptic Problem, (2015). Accessed on February 10, 2022, from http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Synoptic_Problem.htm.
Kuwornu-Adjaottor, Jonathan E. T. “Comparative study of the translation of Pleeroustheen Pnuemati in some Ghanaian mother tongue translations of Ephesians 5:18,” in WAATI Papers, Vol. 8 (2) (2014): 86-89.
Liberati, A., D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P.C. Gøtzsche, J.P.A. Ioannidis, ..., D. Moher, “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration”, Annals of Internal Medicine, 151 (2009): W-65.
Orchard, Bernard and Thomas R. W. Longstaff (eds), J. J. Griesbach: Synoptic and Text – Critical Studies 1776-1976. England: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Porter, Stanley E. and Bryan R. Dyer (eds), The Synoptic Problem: Four Views. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Publishing Group, 2016.
Reinhardt, Jacob W. A Brief Discussion of the Synoptic Problem. Accessed online on May 24, 2022, from https://ajwreinhardt.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/reinhardt_brief_discussion_synoptic_problem.pdf.
Spallek, Andrew J. “The Origin and Meaning of ?????????? in the Pauline Corpus”, Concordia Theological Quarterly, 57(3) (1993): 177-190.
Stamps, Donald C., and John Wesley Adams, Life In The Spirit Study Bible. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2003.
Wallace, J. Warner, Is Mark’s Gospel an Early Memoir of the Apostle Peter? (2018). Accessed on December 06, 2022 at 21:42 GMT, http://www.coldcasechristianity.com/2014/is-marks-gospel-an-early-memoir-of-the-apostle-peter/.
Westcott, Brooke Foss, An Introduction to the Study of the Gospels, 8th ed. London: Macmillan, 1895. Quoted in Paul Enns, The Moody Handbook of Theology. Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2008.
Copyright (c) 2022 Emmanuel Foster Asamoah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).