Political Party’s Vicarious Liability in Political Corruption Cases in Indonesia

Authors

  • Yanuaris Frans Manunuembun Doctoral Candidate at Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University. Address: Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Veteran Street no. 1 Post code: 65125, Malang City, Indonesia. Phone Number +6285235885363. email: yanuaris.fhub@gmail.com
  • Abdul Rachmad Budiono Professor at Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Exspert in Introduction to Jurisprudence, Industrial Dispute Settlement, Civil Procedure Law, Islamic Law, Agreement on Industrial Relations, Labour Law, Islamic Inheritance Law.
  • Abdul Madjid Head of Doctorate of Law in Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Field study in Crime on Penal Code, Special Criminal Law, Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Criminal Law
  • Bambang Sugiri Head of Doctorate of Law in Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Filed Study in Special Criminal Law, Capita Selecta of Criminal Law, Criminal Justice System, and Legal Theory.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v9i6.1927

Keywords:

Political Corruption, state financial losses, vicarious liability, Corruption Law, Sate Financial Losses.

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is distinctive in itself because of the involvement of politicians who sit as state administrators, then from various anti-corruption community groups in Indonesia, this type of corruption that contained political dimension is known as political corruption in terms of national criminal law happened frequently in Indonesia, and since it is done by the power holders, the state financial losses caused by political corruption are relatively huge in number, and the factual fact of the state financial losses in major political corruption cases could not be recovered by the Indonesian General Attorney as the party representing the state, this situation represents violation of the social and economic rights of the Indonesian people, and one of the objectives of the Anti-Corruption Law for various reasons according to Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b of the Anti-Corruption Law, is the recovery of state financial losses.

References

. Alkostar, Artidjo. (2008). Korupsi Politik Di Negara Modern. Yogyakarta, FH UII Press.

. Anti-Corruption Clearing House (ACCH), 30/3/2017, https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/artikel/riset-publik /kajian-awal-melacak-korupsi-politik-di-korporasi, diakses 20/9/2019.

. Anwar, Yesmil dan Adang. (2010). Kriminologi, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

. Carthy, Bill Mc. (2002). New Economics of Sociological Criminology, Annual Review of Sociology, 417-418.

. CNN Indonesia, 07/03/2017, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170307172741-20-198493/ survei-salip-kepolisian-dpr-jadi-lembaga-terkorup, diakses 25/10/2018

. CNN Indonesia, 5/12/2018, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/12/05/10143481/politisi-korup tor-antara-sistem-pemilu-dan-integritas-elite, diakses 21/9/2019.

. CNN Indonesia, 29/01/2019, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190129115215-12-364668/ ipk -akan-dibuka-kpk-sebut-korupsi-politik-capai-60-persen, diakses 15/10/2019.

. Darmodiharjo, Darji dan Shidarta. (2006). Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum, Cetakan ke-6, Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

. Hanafi Amrani, Mahrus Ali, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perkembangan dan Penerapan, Cetakan ke-1, (Depok: Rajawali Pers, Depok, 2015), hlm. 34.

. Jawa Pos. Com, 11/12/2017, https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/hukum-kriminal/11/12/2017/mend agri-tahun-2004-2017-313-kepala-daerah-tersangkut-kasus-korupsi/, diakses 21/10/ 2018.

. JatimTimes.com, 14/2/2020, https://jatimtimes.com/baca/197320/20190717/192400/versi-kpk-ini-le mbaga-terkorup-di-indonesia, diakses 15/2/2020.

. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI), https://kbbi.web.id/makna, diakses 5/9/2019.

. Okenews, 25/9/2018, https://nasional.okezone.com/read/2018/09/25/337/1955309/mahfud-md-unt uk-atasi-korupsi-politik-sistem-kepartaian-harus-ditata-ulang, diakses 20/9/2019.

. Prakoso, Abintoro. (2015). Hukum, Filsafat Logika dan Argumentasi Hukum. Surabaya, LaksBang Justitia.

. Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2017). Ajaran Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korporasi & seluk beluknya, Edisi ke-2, Jakarta: Kencana.

. Sjawie, Hasbullah F. (2006). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Cet. ke-1, Jakarta: Kencana.

. Spinellis, Dionysios. (1994). Crime of Politicians in Office (or “Top Hat Crimes”). General Report for the Round Table Discussion at the XV International Congress of Penal Law (Tuesday September 6, 1994).

. Transparency International Indonesia (TII), Masyarakat Transparansi Indonesia (MTI), Lembaga Independensi Peradilan (LeIP), Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia (MaPPIFHUI), Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional (KRHN), Lembaga Bantuan Hukum (LBH) Jakarta, Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia (YLBHI), “Laporan Masyarakat Sipil tentang Implementasi UNCAC di Indonesia”, Dipersiapkan oleh Ibrahim Z. Fahmy Badoh, TII, untuk evaluasi atas penerapan UNCAC di sektor Parlemen dan Partai Politik, 2013.

. Widoyoko, J. Danang. (2013). Oligarki dan Korupsi Politik Indonesia. Malang, Instran Publishing.

. Wiranata, I Gede AB. (2009). Hukum-Bangun Teori dan Telaah dalam Implementasinya, Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

. Wiyono, R. (2009). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tidak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-17

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

21-30 of 282

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.