Attitudes to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in English Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/6yvrvr29Keywords:
Attitudes, AI application, English WritingAbstract
This paper explores the attitudes of 192 non-English major graduate students towards the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in an English writing course in a Chinese university. Mixed method of a questionnaire and semi-structured interview was used in this study. The result of a questionnaires reveals that the 91% of the graduate students have used AI in their writing assignment. 93.22% of the students thought using AI had helped them to improve the accuracy, fluency and logic of writing. More than 70% of the students thought AI tools had helped them to accurately use grammar and expand their vocabulary. A significant portion of students, precisely 87.5%, believed that AI had improved the efficacy of writing. 86.93% of them held that AI tools had helped them to improve their overall writing abilities. In addition, the interview of 20 students shows that they all considered AI tools could give them timely feedback and assisted them to boost their confidence of writing in English. They could deal with more complicated writing assignments, such as research papers. However, they also encountered challenges of using AI. These challenges as well as the implication of this study in English writing teaching were also discussed.
References
Ai, X. H., Cheng, S. H., & Huang, Y. X. (2024). On the construction and application of knowledge maps of college English in the context of language intelligence. Education Research Monthly, (10), 84-90.
Alsatawi, A., Almoaily, M., Almulhim, F., Alahmadi, N., & Alshengeeti, H. (2025). Attitudes to the use of artificial intelligence in language learning: the case of chatbots in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.376344
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Bigum, C., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Rowan, L. (2003). Literacy, technology and the economics of attention. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 95-122.
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D. A., Tachie-Menson, E., Johnson, E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6
Farah, C. S., & Maybury, T. (2009). Implementing digital technology to enhance student learning of pathology. European Journal of Dental Education, 13(3), 172-178.
Hou, C. Y., Zhu, G. X., Sudarshan, V., Lim, F. S., & Ong, Y. S. (2025). Measuring undergraduate students’ reliance on Generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validation. Computers & Education, 234(2025), 105329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105329
Hu, Z. L. (2023). ChatGPT’s talk about foreign language education. Foreign Languages in China, (3), 12-15.
Huai, J. P. (2024). Working together to promote the application, sharing and innovation of digital education. China Education Network, (1), 1-3.
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5(2024), 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550.
Li, J., & Liu, L. (2021). Large-scale education and personalized training of technology-empowered higher education: logical necessity and practical mechanism. China Educational Technology, (8), 55-62.
Li, M. L. (2022). Research on 5G technology empowers smart classroom teaching. Jiangsu Science and Technology Information, (18), 57-59.
Li, Z. W. (2023). Features, construction and application of knowledge graph for foreign language disciplines. Foreign Languages in China, (2), 70-76.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 1-15.
Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. Vintage.
Pan, H. Y., & Niu, B. G. (2025). Surveying GenAI-enhanced foreign language learners’ writing feedback literacy. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (1), 94-101.
Peterson, M. W., Gordon, J., Elliott, S., & Kreiter, C. (2004). Computer-based testing: initial report of extensive use in a medical school curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16(1), 51-59.
Setiadi, D., Nurhayati, S., Ansori, A., Zubaidi, M., & Amir, R. (2023). Youth’s digital literacy in the context of community empowerment in an emerging society 5.0. Society, 11(1), 1-12.
Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2025). Incorporating ChatGPT for EFL writing and its effects on writing engagement. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1-21.
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J. X., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Experts Systems with Applications, 252(2024), 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Yao, S. Y., Wang, R. Y., Sun, S., Bu, D. R., & Liu, J. (2020). Joint embedding learning of educational knowledge graphs. In Artificial Intelligence Supported Educational Technologies (pp. 209-224).
Zhi, R., & Wang, Y. X. (2024). On the relationship between EFL students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence, teachers’ immediacy and teacher-student rapport, and their willingness to communicate. System, 24(2024), 103341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103341
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hongguo Xue, Ziyan Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
