Extensive Reading in the Korean EAP University Context: A Reconsideration of Its Goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v2i10.227Keywords:
extensive reading, English for Academic Purpose, university, English as a foreign language, graded readersAbstract
Extensive reading for English language learners is commonly promoted as reading for pleasure rather than reading for information. However, Park (2005) observes that the changing trend in the reading habits of the South Korean people over the past decade has been one from reading-for-pleasure to that of reading-for-survival. Globally, people are being met with increasingly difficult economic times and South Korea is no exception. Reading habits are fuelled by need, whether that need may be for pleasure or information. When it comes to the needs of the adult English language learner concerning extensive reading (ER), however, we may sometimes overlook their real needs for practical information in areas of language proficiency and skills development. Rather, in an effort to foster strong reading habits, we may tend to emphasize reading for pleasure through materials that have been written more to entertain than to inform. Korean university students, in particular, are driven by the need to read for information. In this paper, I argue, by reference to Day and Bamford’s (1998) Expectancy-value Model of Motivation for Second Language Reading, that driving university students’ motivation to read extensively in English may be better accomplished by raising both the expectancy and value factors with texts that students are able to read reasonably well, which they also consider very worthwhile reading. These materials, for example, could deal with topics that help learners prepare for academic studies abroad and further their career development. The paper concludes that, for university students, at least, the goals of extensive reading may need to be modified so as not to focus exclusively on ease of reading and entertainment.
References
Day RR, Bamford J, 1998. Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Feather NT, 1982. Introduction and overview. In Expectations and Actions Expectancy-value Models in Psychology. Edited by Feather NT. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1–14.
Grabe W, 2001. Reading-writing relations: theoretical perspectives and instructional practices. In Linking Literacies : Perspectives on L2 Reading-writing Connections. Edited by Belcher D, Hirvela A. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 15–47.
Heo S-Y, 2012. A study on the initial stage of extensive reading process through college students’ journal writing. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(3): 77–92.
Hill DR, 2012. Graded readers. ELT Journal, 67(1): 85–125.
Kim B-G, 2012. Extensive reading program in a university writing class: vocabulary use of less proficient students. English Language Teaching, 14(2): 1.
Kim J-R, 2012. A meta-study of extensive English reading researches. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(2): 85–106.
Kim J-S, 2012. Bringing extensive reading into university English reading classes. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(1): 69–89.
Macalister J, 2007. Implementing extensive reading in an EAP programme. ELT Journal, 62(3): 248–256.
Oh K-M, 2011. An extensive reading study in university English classes. English Language & Linguistics, 17(1): 133–165.
Park J, 2005. The publishing business in South Korea—are we heading in the right direction? Publishing Research Quarterly, 21(2): 56–60.
Shaffer DE, 2012. In defense of extensive reading for language learning. In Proceedings of the KAPEE 2012 International Conference, Busan, South Korea: 14 January 2012.
Waring R, 2009. The inescapable case for extensive reading. In Extensive Reading in English Language Teaching. Edited by Cirocki A. Munich, Germany: LINCOM Europa, 93–111.
Yang E-M, 2010. A study on the effectiveness of extensive reading in college English classes. English Language & Literature Teaching, 16(2): 169–188.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
