How Could Prison Products Come into the International Market? Analysis of the Consistency between WTO and ILO Rules
Keywords:Global market, ILO, Prison product, WTO/GATT.
AbstractNowadays, in many countries, a increasing number of private companies resort to prison labor. In fact, inmates work more and more for private undertakings both inside and outside prison. In consideration of private companies generally engaged in international trade, prison labor thus participate in global supply chains. Then under such circumstances, there is a developing trend that prison economy is being marketed internationally. Nevertheless, there are some institutional barriers in international trade policies, such as WTO rules, which in principle prohibit prison labor product coming into international market. This research aims to discuss the possibility of exports of prison products in international trade market within WTO/GATT framework. In terms of prisoners’ labor rights protection, by exploring the consistency of WTO rule with ILO standard, the research intends to find the possibility of prison labor product being accepted by the international market. Feasibility analysis is developed in the research to propose constructive suggestion for an open question in the international law.
Aman, Alfred C. and Greenhouse, Carol. (2015). Prison Privatization and Inmate Labor in the Global Economy: Reframing the Debate over Private Prisons. Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol.42,2015; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 317.Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2608572
Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (Eds.). (2007). The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis. International Trade Law Center, Springer Science & Business Media.
Chartres, Renee L. and Mercurio, Bryan Christopher. (May 23, 2012). A Call for an Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Labor: Why and How the WTO Should Play a Role in Upholding Core Labor Standards. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Vol. 37, pp. 665-724, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2065621
Compa, L. (1993). Labor Rights and Labor Standards in International Trade [Electronic version]. Retrieved [09 June, 2016], from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/341/
Diane Desierto. (2015). Public Policy in International Economic Law: The ICESCR in Trade, Finance, and Investment.OUP Oxford.
Daniel C. K. Chow, (2014). Why China Opposes Human Rights in the World Trade Organization.35 J. Int'l L. issue 1, pp. 61-111. Available at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol35/iss1/2
Daniel C. K. Chow, Thomas J. Schoenbaum. (2012). International Trade Law: Problems, Cases, and Materials (2d ed.). Aspen Publishers.
Fick, Barbara J., (Sept. 30, 2014). Corporate Social Responsibility for Enforcement of Labor Rights: Are There More Effective Alternatives?. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2601006 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2601006
Freeman R. International Labor Standards and World Trade: Friends or Foes?. In: The World Trading System: Challenges Ahead. Vol. 87-114. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics; 1997. pp. 87-114. Available at: https://piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/66/5iie2350.pdf
Globerson, Micah. (2013)."Using Border Trade Adjustments to Address Labor Rights Concerns Under the WTO." Labor & Employment Law Forum 3, no. 1 (2013): 48-87. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=lelb
Gabrielle Marceau, (2002). WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights. 13 EUR. J. INT’L L.
Levin, Benjamin. (June 18, 2014). Inmates for Rent, Sovereignty for Sale: The Global Prison Market. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2456422
Milman-Sivan, Faina. (March 1, 2013). Prisoners for Hire: Towards a Normative Justification of the ILO's Prohibition of Private Forced Prisoner Labor. Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2408864
Sarah Cleveland. (2002). Human Rights Sanctions and International Trade: A Theory of Compatibility, 5 J. INT’L ECON. L. 133 (2002).
Tilahun Weldie Hindeya. (2013). Unilateral Trade Sanctions as a Means to Combat Human Rights Abuses: Legal and Factual Appraisal. Mizan Law Review, Vol 7, No. 1. Available at: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/mlr/article/view/100558
Trebilcock M. J., Robert Howse, & Antonia Eliason (Eds.).(2013). The Regulation of International Trade (4th ed.). Routledge.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).