First and Second Inaugural Addresses of Modern and Traditional U.S. Presidents: An Analysis of Self-Presentational Strategies

Stephanie H. Smith, George I Whitehead, Matthew F. Blackard, Michael F. Blackard

Abstract


The present study examines the self-presentational strategies modern and traditional U.S. presidents employed in their first and second inaugural addresses. Specifically, we examined the presidents’ use of the strategies of ingratiation, self-promotion, exemplification, ingratiation, and supplication. We predicted that modern presidents would use more ingratiation than would their traditional counterparts in the first but not the second inaugural address. This prediction derives from an analysis of the president’s dependency on the public at the time of the inaugural address. In particular, the president is not as dependent on the public at the time of the second inaugural as compared with the first inaugural. We also predicted that modern presidents would use more self-promotion than would traditional presidents in the second but not the first inaugural address. And, finally we predicted that modern presidents would use more exemplification and intimidation than would traditional presidents. Our results supported several predictions.


Keywords


Self-presentation, U.S. presidents, ingratiation, inaugural addresses.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barbour, C., & Wright, G. (2012). Keeping the republic: Power and citizenship in American politics. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Baumeister, R. F., & Jones, E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608-618. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.608

Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Presidents creating the presidency: Deeds done in words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Donley, R.E., & Winter, D.G. (1970). Measuring the motives of public officials at a distance: An exploratory study of American presidents. Behavioral Science, 15, 227-235. doi:10.1002/bs.3830150304

Fallows, J. (2004). The state of the union moment. In T. Halstead (Ed.), The real state of the union (pp. 3 – 6). New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, W.L., & Avolio, B.J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 22, 32-58.

Godfrey, D.K., Jones, E.E., & Lord, C.G. (1986) Self-promotion is not ingratiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 106-115. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.106

Greenstein, F.I. (1978). Change and continuity in the modern presidency. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 45-85). Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Greenstein, F.I. (1988). Leadership in the modern presidency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Greenstein, F.I., Berman, L., & Felzenberg, A. (1977). Evolution of the American presidency: A bibliographical survey. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Hesse, M. (2013, January 15). For many presidential inaugurations, the second time is not the charm. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/for-many-presidential-inaugurations-the-second-time-is-not-the-charm/2013/01/15/e7a8f456-5923-11e2-beee-6e38f5215402_story.html

Jones, E.E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social-psychological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Jones, E.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Vol. 1 (pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.

Leary, M. R. (1989). Self-presentational processes in leadership emergence and effectiveness. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 363-374). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Nichols, D.K. (1994). The myth of the modern presidency, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Pfiffner, J. P. (1994). The modern presidency. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Shaw, M. (Ed.). (1987). The modern presidency: From Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Harper and Row.

Smith, S.H., Whitehead, G.I., Melo, A., Correa, A., & Inch, M. (2014). Self-presentational strategies of modern and traditional U.S. Presidents in state of the union and inaugural addresses. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 13-24.

Tulis, J. (1987). The rhetorical presidency. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Whitehead, G.I. & Smith, S.H. (1999). Self-presentational strategies of modern and traditional presidents. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 479-490.

Whitehead, G.I. & Smith, S.H. (2001). Motive profiles of modern and traditional presidents. Journal of Psychology, 135, 237-240. doi:10.1080/00223980109603694.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/journal.v4i5.718

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.............................................................................................................................

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

.............................................................................................................................

If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to support@theartsjournal.org. Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add theartsjournal.org in your email safe list.

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Print) ISSN:2167-9045

Journal of Arts and Humanities (Online) ISSN: 2167-9053